Files
the-biergarten-app/docs/architecture.md
Aaron Po de1e9ac02b Migrate Auth/Brewery/Location repositories to pure Dapper; rename Timer to RowVersion (#237)
* Integrate Spectre.Console into seed application, use async data loading

* Replace stored-procedure repositories with Dapper-based repositories

Removes the USP_* stored procedures for Auth, Location, and Brewery
data access in favour of services built with Dapper.

Adds a new Features.Locations slice and optimistic concurrency support
for the Brewery slice.

* Add new documentation for Dapper migration/database schema

* Update FluentAssertions to most recent open source ver

* Update XML doc comment in backend projects

* Modify brewery location dto to include denormalized data

* - Updated column names from 'Timer' to 'RowVersion' in schema.sql for
- Introduced new BeerPost entity and updated BreweryPost and BreweryPostLocation entities to use 'RowVersion' for concurrency.
- Modified UserAccount, UserCredential, UserVerification, City, StateProvince, and Country entities to use 'RowVersion' instead of 'Timer'.
- Updated tests and command handlers to reflect changes in concurrency token from 'Timer' to 'RowVersion'.
- Adjusted BreweryDto and BreweryDtoMapper to include 'RowVersion' and updated mapping logic accordingly.
- Ensured all repository methods and interfaces are aligned with the new concurrency handling approach.

* updates

* Add BeerStyle entity and related properties; refactor BreweryDto to remove BeerPosts

* Fix Api.Specs test failures: stale Timer column refs and missing test.user fixture

* Remove repository tests, usages of registration dto used in repo

* archive old stored procs/functions

* update stale docs

* Add instructions for generating cryptographically secure base64 secrets on macOS/Linux and Windows
2026-08-24 01:09:47 -04:00

564 lines
21 KiB
Markdown

# Architecture
This document describes the active architecture of The Biergarten App.
## High-level overview
The Biergarten App is a monorepo with a clear split between the backend and the
active website:
- **Backend**: .NET 10 Web API with SQL Server, organized as vertical feature
slices with MediatR
- **Frontend**: React 19 + React Router 7 website in `web/frontend`
- **Architecture Style**: Vertical-slice backend plus server-rendered React
frontend
The legacy Next.js frontend has been retained in `archive/next-js-web-app/` for
reference only.
## Diagrams
For visual representations, see:
- [architecture.svg](website/diagrams-out/architecture.svg) - Vertical-slice
architecture diagram
- [deployment.svg](website/diagrams-out/deployment.svg) - Docker deployment
diagram
- [authentication-flow.svg](website/diagrams-out/authentication-flow.svg) -
Authentication workflow
- [database-schema.svg](website/diagrams-out/database-schema.svg) - Database
relationships
## Backend architecture
### Vertical-slice architecture pattern
The backend organizes business capabilities as feature slices instead of
technical layers. Each feature (`Features.Auth`, `Features.Breweries`,
`Features.UserManagement`, `Features.Emails`, `Features.Locations`) is a single
project that owns its own MediatR commands/queries/handlers, validators, and
repository end to end. `Features.Emails` and `Features.Locations` have no
`Controllers/` folder — both are invoked internally by other slices via
MediatR/DI, never over HTTP:
```
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ API.Core (thin host) │
│ - Program.cs wiring: MediatR + AddApplicationPart per slice │
│ - Swagger/OpenAPI, JWT auth middleware, global exception filter │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓ discovers controllers via AddApplicationPart
┌───────────────┬───────────────┬───────────────────┬──────────────────┬──────────────────┐
│ Features.Auth │Features. │ Features. │ Features.Emails │ Features. │
│ │Breweries │ UserManagement │ (no controller, │ Locations │
│ Controller │ Controller │ Controller │ internal only) │ (no controller, │
│ Commands/ │ Commands/ │ Commands/ │ Commands/ │ internal only) │
│ Queries + │ Queries + │ Queries + │ Handlers │ Repository │
│ Handlers │ Handlers │ Handlers │ │ │
│ Repository │ Repository │ Repository │ EmailDispatcher │ │
└───────────────┴───────────────┴───────────────────┴──────────────────┴──────────────────┘
↓ each slice depends only on shared/domain/infra, never on another slice
┌─────────────────────────┬─────────────────────────┬────────────────────┐
│ Shared.Contracts │ Shared.Application │ Domain.Entities / │
│ (ResponseBody envelope) │ (ValidationBehavior, │ Domain.Exceptions │
│ │ cross-slice email cmds) │ │
└─────────────────────────┴─────────────────────────┴────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Infrastructure.Sql, Infrastructure.Jwt, Infrastructure.PasswordHashing, │
│ Infrastructure.Email, Infrastructure.Email.Templates │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Database (SQL Server) │
│ - Tables & constraints │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘
```
Slices never reference each other's project. The one cross-slice interaction
(`Features.Auth` triggering a confirmation email handled by `Features.Emails`)
goes through a MediatR command (`SendRegistrationEmailCommand`) whose contract
lives in `Shared.Application`, so neither slice takes a project reference on the
other.
### Layer responsibilities
#### API layer (`API.Core`)
**Purpose**: Thin ASP.NET Core host: no business logic, no controllers of its
own
**Components**:
- `Program.cs`: registers MediatR (scanning every `Features.*` assembly),
FluentValidation, and uses `AddApplicationPart` so each slice's controllers
are discovered by MVC
- `GlobalException.cs`: global exception filter (host-level cross-cutting
concern)
- `Authentication/JwtAuthenticationHandler.cs`: JWT auth scheme middleware
- Swagger/OpenAPI documentation, health check endpoints
**Dependencies**:
- Every `Features.*` project (for controller/MediatR discovery)
- `Shared.Contracts`, `Shared.Application`
- `Infrastructure.Jwt` (for the auth middleware)
**Rules**:
- No controllers, no business logic, no feature-specific contracts
- Exists purely to host and wire up the feature slices
#### Feature slices (`Features.Auth`, `Features.Breweries`, `Features.UserManagement`, `Features.Emails`, `Features.Locations`)
**Purpose**: Each slice is the complete vertical for one business capability
**Components** (per slice):
- `Controllers/`: HTTP endpoints, binding directly to Command/Query types as the
request contract
- `Commands/<Operation>/` and `Queries/<Operation>/`: one folder per operation,
each containing the Command/Query record, its `IRequestHandler`, and (for
commands) a FluentValidation validator
- `Repository/`: the slice's own Dapper repository implementation
- `Dtos/`: response shapes returned by query handlers (never the raw domain
entity)
- `DependencyInjection/`: an `AddFeaturesX()` extension method registering the
slice's repository/services
`Features.Emails` has no `Controllers/` folder. It's invoked only via MediatR
commands sent from other slices, never over HTTP. `Features.Locations` also has
no `Controllers/` folder and no MediatR handlers — it exposes
`ILocationRepository` directly as a plain service, currently consumed only by
`Database.Seed` to look up cities while seeding brewery locations. Other slices
(for example, `Features.Breweries`) do not yet depend on it; they run their own
`CityID` existence checks inline.
**Dependencies**:
- `Domain.Entities`, `Domain.Exceptions`
- `Infrastructure.Sql` (generic ADO.NET plumbing) plus whichever infrastructure
project the slice needs (`Infrastructure.Jwt`/
`Infrastructure.PasswordHashing` for Auth, `Infrastructure.Email`/
`Infrastructure.Email.Templates` for Emails)
- `Shared.Contracts`, `Shared.Application`
- **Never** another `Features.*` project
**Rules**:
- All business logic for that feature lives in its command/query handlers
- No direct controller-to-repository calls; everything flows through MediatR
- Read endpoints return a dedicated `Dto`, never the domain entity directly
#### Shared projects (`Shared.Contracts`, `Shared.Application`)
**Purpose**: The minimum cross-slice surface area required because every slice
needs it, or because duplicating it four times would be worse than sharing it
**Components**:
- `Shared.Contracts`: `ResponseBody<T>`/`ResponseBody`, the API response
envelope every controller returns
- `Shared.Application`: `ValidationBehavior<TRequest,TResponse>` (the MediatR
pipeline behavior that runs FluentValidation before a handler executes) and
the cross-slice email commands (`SendRegistrationEmailCommand`,
`SendResendConfirmationEmailCommand`)
**Rules**:
- Kept deliberately small: this is the exception to "no slice depends on another
slice," not a general-purpose dumping ground
#### Infrastructure layer
**Purpose**: Technical capabilities and external integrations, shared by
whichever slices need them
**Components**:
- **Infrastructure.Sql**: generic ADO.NET connection/command plumbing
(`ISqlConnectionFactory`, the abstract `Repository<T>` base class), not
domain-specific; each slice's own `Repository/` folder builds on this
- **Infrastructure.Jwt**: JWT token generation and validation
- **Infrastructure.PasswordHashing**: Argon2id password hashing
- **Infrastructure.Email**: Email sending capabilities (SMTP/MailKit)
- **Infrastructure.Email.Templates**: Email template rendering (Razor
components)
**Dependencies**:
- Domain entities
- External libraries (ADO.NET, JWT, Argon2, MailKit, and so on)
**Rules**:
- Implements technical concerns only, no business logic
- Reusable across slices
#### Domain layer (`Domain.Entities`)
**Purpose**: Core business entities and models
**Components**:
- `UserAccount` - User profile data
- `UserCredential` - Authentication credentials
- `UserVerification` - Account verification state
- `BreweryPost` - A user-submitted brewery listing
- `BreweryPostLocation` - A brewery's address and coordinates
- `City` - A city referenced by a brewery location
- `StateProvince` - A state/province referenced by a city
- `Country` - A country referenced by a state/province
- `BeerStyle` - A beer style/category (schema table exists; no repository yet)
- `BeerPost` - A beer listing tied to a brewery and style (schema table
exists; no repository yet)
**Dependencies**:
- None (pure domain)
**Rules**:
- Plain Old CLR Objects (POCOs)
- No framework dependencies
- No infrastructure references
- Represents business concepts
### Design patterns
#### Vertical slice + MediatR
**Purpose**: Organize code by feature instead of by technical layer, so
everything needed to understand or change one capability lives in one project
**Implementation**:
- Each HTTP write operation is a `Command` (for example, `CreateBreweryCommand`
in `Features.Breweries/Commands/CreateBrewery/`); each read operation is a
`Query` (for example, `GetBreweryByIdQuery`)
- Controllers bind directly to the Command/Query as the request body; there is
no separate request DTO + mapping step for writes
- A single shared `ValidationBehavior<TRequest,TResponse>`
(`Shared.Application/Behaviors/`) runs FluentValidation validators in the
MediatR pipeline before any handler executes
- Query handlers map to a dedicated response `Dto`, so domain entities never
leak over the wire
**Example**:
```csharp
public record CreateBreweryCommand(Guid PostedById, string BreweryName, string Description, ...)
: IRequest<BreweryDto>;
public class CreateBreweryHandler(IBreweryRepository repository) : IRequestHandler<CreateBreweryCommand, BreweryDto>
{
public async Task<BreweryDto> Handle(CreateBreweryCommand request, CancellationToken cancellationToken) { ... }
}
```
#### Repository pattern
**Purpose**: Abstract database access behind interfaces
**Implementation**: each slice owns its own repository, scoped to that feature
only:
- `Features.Auth/Repository/IAuthRepository.cs`
- `Features.Breweries/Repository/IBreweryRepository.cs`
- `Features.UserManagement/Repository/IUserAccountRepository.cs`
- `Infrastructure.Sql/DefaultSqlConnectionFactory.cs`: the generic connection
factory every slice's repository builds on
**Benefits**:
- Testable (easy to mock)
- Each slice's data access logic is self-contained
**Example**:
```csharp
public interface IAuthRepository
{
Task<UserCredential> GetUserCredentialAsync(string username);
Task<int> CreateUserAccountAsync(UserAccount user, UserCredential credential);
}
```
#### Dependency injection
**Purpose**: Loose coupling and testability
**Configuration**: `Program.cs` wires up MediatR/FluentValidation across every
`Features.*` assembly; each slice exposes its own `AddFeaturesX()` extension
method that registers its repository and slice-internal services
**Lifetimes**:
- Scoped: Repositories, slice-internal services (per request)
- Singleton: `ISqlConnectionFactory`
- Transient: Utilities, helpers
#### Direct SQL via Dapper/ADO.NET
**Purpose**: Keep data access explicit and colocated with the slice that owns
it, without an ORM's change-tracking or mapping magic
**Strategy**:
- No ORM (Entity Framework not used); each repository issues inline SQL
through Dapper, with no manual `IDbCommand` parameter binding. The one
wrinkle is the `GEOGRAPHY` column on `BreweryPostLocation`, which Dapper
can't deserialize as a UDT: reads select `CONVERT(varbinary(max),
Coordinates)` so the value comes back as a plain `byte[]` Dapper can bind
- Referential checks that a stored procedure used to perform (e.g. "does this
`CityId` exist?") are now explicit `SELECT 1 ...` existence checks in the
repository method, run inside the same transaction as the write
- Optimistic concurrency uses each table's `RowVersion` (`ROWVERSION`) column,
checked in the `UPDATE ... WHERE ... AND RowVersion = @RowVersion` clause
- Repositories throw `Domain.Exceptions` types (`NotFoundException`,
`ConflictException`, ...) directly when a check fails, rather than relying on
a database-side `THROW`; `API.Core`'s `GlobalExceptionFilter` maps those
exception types to HTTP status codes
- Application focuses on orchestration; the database enforces integrity via
keys, `CHECK` constraints, and cascades
See [Database](website/database.md) for the schema and the app's current SQL
error-handling approach in more detail.
## Frontend architecture
### Active website (`web/frontend`)
The current website is a React Router 7 application with server-side rendering
enabled.
```text
web/frontend/
├── app/
│ ├── components/ Shared UI such as Navbar, FormField, SubmitButton, ToastProvider
│ ├── lib/ Auth helpers, schemas, and theme metadata
│ ├── routes/ Route modules for home, login, register, dashboard, confirm, theme
│ ├── root.tsx App shell and global providers
│ └── app.css Theme tokens and global styling
├── .storybook/ Storybook config and preview setup
├── stories/ Storybook stories for shared UI and themes
├── tests/playwright/ Storybook Playwright coverage
└── package.json Frontend scripts and dependencies
```
### Frontend responsibilities
- Render the auth demo and theme guide routes
- Manage cookie-backed website session state
- Call the .NET API for login, registration, token refresh, and confirmation
- Provide shared UI building blocks for forms, navigation, themes, and toasts
- Supply Storybook documentation and browser-based component verification
### Theme system
The active website uses semantic DaisyUI theme tokens backed by four Biergarten
themes:
- Biergarten Lager
- Biergarten Stout
- Biergarten Cassis
- Biergarten Weizen
All component styling should prefer semantic tokens such as `primary`,
`success`, `surface`, and `highlight` instead of hard-coded color values.
### Legacy frontend
The previous Next.js frontend has been archived at `archive/next-js-web-app/`
for reference only. Active product and engineering documentation should point to
`web/frontend`.
## Security architecture
### Authentication flow
1. **Registration**:
- User submits credentials
- Password hashed with Argon2id
- User account created (unverified) and a confirmation email is dispatched
via `Features.Emails`
2. **Email confirmation**:
- User follows the confirmation link/token from the email
- `Features.Auth`'s `ConfirmUser` command marks the account verified
3. **Login**:
- User submits credentials
- Password verified against hash
- Access and refresh JWTs are issued; the refresh token is stored server-side
against the user's credential row
4. **Token refresh**:
- Client exchanges a valid, unexpired refresh token for a new access/refresh
pair via `Features.Auth`'s `RefreshToken` command
- Refresh tokens are stateless JWTs, not tracked server-side: the previous
refresh token is not invalidated and remains usable until its own
expiration
5. **API Requests**:
- Client sends the access JWT in the `Authorization` header
- `JwtAuthenticationHandler` validates the token
- Request proceeds if valid
### Password security
**Algorithm**: Argon2id
- Memory: 64MB
- Iterations: 4
- Parallelism: CPU core count
- Salt: 128-bit (16 bytes)
- Hash: 256-bit (32 bytes)
### JWT tokens
**Algorithm**: HS256 (HMAC-SHA256)
**Claims**:
- `sub` - User ID
- `unique_name` - Username
- `jti` - Unique token ID
- `iat` - Issued at timestamp
- `exp` - Expiration timestamp
**Configuration** (appsettings.json):
```json
{
"Jwt": {
"ExpirationMinutes": 60,
"Issuer": "biergarten-api",
"Audience": "biergarten-users"
}
}
```
## Database architecture
For the table-by-table schema and the custom SQL error code scheme, see
[Database](website/database.md).
### SQL-first philosophy
**Principles**:
1. Database is source of truth
2. Queries live in the owning repository, not scattered across the app
3. Database handles referential integrity
4. Application orchestrates, database executes
**Benefits**:
- Performance optimization via execution plans
- Query logic scoped to the repository that owns it, not spread across layers
- Version-controlled schema (migrations)
- Easier query profiling and tuning
### Migration strategy
**Tool**: DbUp
**Process**:
1. Write a SQL script under `Database.Migrations/scripts/`
2. Embed it in the `Database.Migrations` project
3. `Database.Migrations` runs each script against the target database on
startup, tracked so a script never re-runs once applied
**Migration Files**:
```
scripts/
└── 01-schema/
└── schema.sql # full table/index/constraint definitions
```
Currently the whole schema is a single versioned script. As the schema evolves,
new numbered scripts get added alongside it rather than editing `schema.sql` in
place, so DbUp's already-applied tracking stays valid.
### Data seeding
**Purpose**: Populate development/test databases with realistic data
**Implementation**: `Database.Seed` project, using data produced by the C++
pipeline under `tooling/pipeline/` (see [Pipeline README](pipeline/README.md))
**Seed Data**:
- Countries, state/provinces, and cities (via `Features.Locations`'
`ILocationRepository`, which creates `Country`/`StateProvince` rows on
demand while resolving a city)
- User accounts (via `Features.Auth`'s repository)
- Brewery posts with locations (via `Features.Breweries`' repository)
Tables that exist in the schema but have no repository yet (`Photo`,
`UserAvatar`, `UserFollow`, `BeerStyle`, `BeerPost`, `BeerPostPhoto`,
`BeerPostComment`, `BreweryPostPhoto`) are not seeded.
## Deployment architecture
### Docker containerization
**Container Structure**:
- `sqlserver` - SQL Server 2022
- `database.migrations` - Schema migration runner
- `database.seed` - Data seeder
- `api.core` - ASP.NET Core Web API
- `mailpit` - Local dev/test SMTP server + web UI (not used in production)
**Environments**:
- Development (`docker-compose.dev.yaml`)
- Testing (`docker-compose.test.yaml`)
- Production (`docker-compose.prod.yaml`)
For details, see [Docker Guide](website/docker.md).
### Health checks
- **SQL Server**: Validates database connectivity
- **API**: Checks service health and dependencies
**Configuration**:
```yaml
healthcheck:
test: ["CMD-SHELL", "sqlcmd health check"]
interval: 10s
retries: 12
start_period: 30s
```
## Testing architecture
### Test pyramid
```
┌──────────────┐
│ Integration │ ← API.Specs (Reqnroll)
│ Tests │
├──────────────┤
│ Unit Tests │ ← Features.Auth.Tests, Features.Breweries.Tests,
│ (per slice, │ Features.UserManagement.Tests, Features.Emails.Tests
│ handler │ (commands/queries/handlers, with repository/service
│ tests) │ dependencies mocked via Moq)
└──────────────┘
```
**Strategy**:
- Many unit tests (fast, isolated)
- Fewer integration tests (slower, e2e)
- Mock external dependencies
- Test database for integration tests
For details, see [Testing Guide](website/testing.md).